ConnectEd: The California Center for College and Career
Home
About ConnectEd
Multiple Pathways
Frequently Asked Questions
Model Programs
Policy Work
Curriculum Development
The ToolKit
Publications
Press Room
Presentations Archive
Contact Us
Coalition

Publications

Pathways are programs of high school study that connect learning in the classroom with real-world applications outside of school. They integrate rigorous academic instruction with a demanding technical curriculum and field-based learning—all set in the context of one of California’s 15 major industry sectors.

Students pursue a pathway over multiple years and graduate prepared for the full range of post-graduation options—which can include two- or four-year college, certification programs, apprenticeships, formal job training, or military service. Multiple pathways offer a challenging vehicle that inspires students to learn, and gives them access to education that is both rigorous and relevant.

Growing evidence shows that pathways hold promise for reducing high school dropout rates, increasing academic achievement and learning, and increasing students’ earning power when they graduate. Equally compelling, studies show that students enrolled in pathways perform as well as their traditionally educated counterparts on key measures.

Core Components of Multiple Pathways

A multiple pathways approach creates strong options for students. Each pathway is organized around a major industry sector such as finance and business; health science and medical technology; building and environmental design; engineering; and arts, media, and entertainment. In turn, each pathway contains four essential ingredients.

1. A challenging academic component

A challenging academic component prepares students for success—without remediation—in California’s community colleges and universities, as well as in apprenticeships and other postsecondary programs. Central to each pathway is instruction in essential subjects, typically spanning multiple years and always placed in the context of real-world application. Pathways feature innovative approaches to delivering college-preparatory subjects including:

  • English—four years
  • Mathematics—including algebra, geometry, and advanced algebra or statistics
  • Science—two years including biology, chemistry, or physics
  • Social Studies—three years including American and world history, U.S. government and economics
  • Foreign language—two years emphasizing oral communication and cross-cultural understanding
  • Visual and performing arts—one year

2. A demanding technical component

A demanding technical component delivers concrete knowledge and skills. The focus is on preparing youth for high-skill, high-wage employment through an emphasis on real-world applications that bring their academic and technical learning to life.

3. A work-based learning component

A work-based learning component offers opportunities to learn through real-world experiences. Students gain access to intensive internships, virtual apprenticeships, and school-based enterprises. These experiences complement classroom instruction, helping sharpen students’ desire to increase knowledge and skills that are relevant to their career interests.

4. Supplemental services

Supplemental services include counseling as well as additional instruction in reading, writing, and mathematics. In the best application, each pathway spans grades nine to 12 and connects directly to a set of postsecondary options.

Guiding Principles

Each pathway is grounded in a set of four guiding principles.
Pathways...

1. Prepare students for postsecondary education and career,

A pathway is always about both objectives; it’s never a choice between one or the other. Here’s why: The probability of making a living wage in today’s economy without some form of postsecondary education is already low and will only diminish. Increasingly, career success depends on postsecondary education and gaining a formal credential—a certificate, associate’s degree, bachelor’s degree, or higher level of achievement. If there ever was a day when high schools could be content to prepare some students just for college and others just for work, that day is past.

2. Connect academics to real-world applications,

Each pathway integrates challenging academics with a demanding career and technical curriculum. Pathways alter how core academic subjects are taught; they do not lower expectations about what is taught. Through the pathways approach, students are expected to achieve at high levels in mathematics, science, English, social studies, and foreign language. Students master these subjects through the power of real-world application—they learn by being presented with authentic problems and situations that are part of the modern workplace.

3. Lead to the full range of postsecondary opportunities, and

Pathways prepare students for all the avenues they might pursue following high school graduation: two- and four-year college, certification programs, apprenticeships, formal job training, and military service. Each pathway represents a broad industry theme that can appeal to and engage a student regardless of his or her prior academic achievement and postsecondary aspirations. Pathways can eliminate current practices that sort and track high school students in ways that limit their options after high school.

4. Improve student achievement.

Pathways are based on accountability. They are designed to produce higher levels of accomplishment in a number of measurable arenas, including academic and technical scores, high school completion, postsecondary transitions to career and education, and attainment of a formal postsecondary credential. They also contribute, in ways that most conventional academic and career and technical education curricula do not, to increased student proficiency in vital areas such as critical thinking, problem solving, media and information literacy, and collaboration. Finally, pathways make an immediate difference—helping young people gain higher earnings right after high school and giving these students a leg up in the labor market while they pursue postsecondary education.

Evidence that Multiple Pathways Work

Evidence is building around the promise of multiple pathways to improve high schools. Probably the most recent and comprehensive assessment of the research debates—philosophical, theoretical, and empirical—surrounding academic and career preparation in American high schools is made by Jeanne Oakes and her colleagues at University of California at Los Angeles. This UCLA report concludes that, while all the evidence is not yet in, there is a strong case for making multiple pathways a major focus of high school reform.

Other studies also offer evidence that multiple pathways, when well-designed and implemented, can produce substantial learning benefits for many of California’s high school students. Read on to learn more about findings in key areas:

1. Learning in Context

Some of the more convincing findings supporting multiple pathways began emerging in the 1980s from work in learning theory and cognitive science. Research shows that many people learn better and faster, and retain information longer, when they are taught concepts in context.

One study focused on young soldiers who lacked basic literary skills when they entered the military. One group was taught to read in the context of their daily tasks, while others participated in a traditional literacy program. The study found that those who were taught to read in the context of tasks not only increased their competency in those tasks but also improved their general reading skills—all in a relatively short time period. In fact, the gains in general reading skills were equal to or greater than those produced by the conventional literacy program, while gains in job-related reading exceeded the traditional program by a factor of four or five (Sticht 2002; Sticht et al. 1987).

Called “functional-context education,” these techniques have been successfully used to teach literacy and other skills in nonmilitary adult education programs. In 2002, the U.S. Department of Education’s What Works Clearinghouse, which screens and identifies high-quality research, recognized functional context education as an effective approach (Fletcher 2006).

Another prominent study offered strong evidence that integrated academic and technical curriculum leads to higher test scores if implemented well. In this research, career and technical education (CTE) teachers were paired with mathematics teachers who identified the mathematical content embedded in the CTE teachers’ subjects and developed lesson plans to teach the math within the occupational context (Stone et al. 2006). The 57 CTE teachers who helped develop the math-enhanced lessons were randomly assigned to classrooms and delivered the curriculum for about 10 percent of class time over the course of one year; 74 CTE teachers not participating in such development taught other classrooms with traditional instruction.

The almost 3,000 enrolled students were given math pre-tests and were tested again a year later. Those taught the integrated curriculum significantly outscored the control group on two tests of math ability (Stone et al. 2006).

Other research on the effectiveness of career academies and other forms of career and technical education also provides strong evidence of the benefits of pathways. While more research should be done, the findings suggest that teaching integrated curricula can improve student outcomes in specific, measurable areas.

2. Higher Earning Power

An integrated curriculum combined with work-based learning and career guidance can lead to higher wages after high school. Employing rigorous experimental design and random assignment, an MDRC study examined the outcomes of 1,700 students enrolled in career academies that offered the multiple pathways approach to predominantly minority students. The study showed that four years after graduation from high school, career academy graduates were earning more than their traditionally educated counterparts. While this was true for both men and women, the result was statistically significant for academy males, who earned 18 percent ($10,000) more over the four-year period after high school (Kemple and Scott- Clayton 2004).

The study could not isolate the precise causes of these higher earnings. The wage gains could reflect mastery of general industry knowledge and skill, an increased ability to apply academic knowledge and skill, greater proficiency in problem solving, development of networking and teamwork skills, or other learning not measured by conventional standardized achievement tests. Nevertheless, the earning gains enjoyed by academy students suggest that additional learning was occurring in academy programs, which was sufficiently valued by employers to warrant higher wages.

This study found further that academy students did neither better nor worse than comparable high school students on academic achievement as measured by standardized tests. Nor was the academy students’ postsecondary attainment compromised. Since these career academies were not yet teaching core academics any differently from the way courses were taught in traditional high school classes, these results are not surprising. It remains to be seen whether more contextualized or problem-based approaches to academic instruction can produce higher academic gains and better rates of postsecondary persistence and attainment.

3. Higher Academic Achievement

Other research on career academies is also promising—indicating increases in graduation rates, exit exam passing rates, and the number of students eligible for state colleges. In a study conducted collaboratively by ConnectEd: The California Center for College and Career, and the Career Academy Support Network at the University of California at Berkeley, researchers found that students in California’s partnership academies were much more likely to complete the 15 academic courses (the a–g requirements) needed to be eligible for admission to California’s public colleges and universities. The study found that 50 percent of graduating seniors in partnership academies had completed the a–g requirements, compared to only 39 percent of graduates statewide (Bradby et al. 2007).

Similarly, academy students were much more likely to pass the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE). For example, 71 percent of African American students in academies passed the math portion of the CAHSEE in 2005, compared with 55 percent of all African American high school students in the state.

Graduation rates were also better, with 96 percent of academy seniors graduating compared to only 87 percent of high school seniors statewide (Bradby et al. 2007). (Data were unavailable for the study to calculate graduation rates from entry in ninth grade to graduation.) While it is possible that selection effects—that students enrolled in the academies were more motivated or better prepared to begin with— account for some of the outcome, it seems unlikely that this could explain such a large difference.

Even without an integrated curriculum, students simply taking both academic and technical courses may have lower dropout rates and better achievement gains than comparison groups of students. A study examining data on more than 4,000 students found that those in California’s ROCPs improved their grade point averages more than comparison students enrolled in non-CTE programs. ROCP students were as likely to enroll in postsecondary education and to earn higher wages. Significantly, these students were lower achieving and of lower socioeconomic status than the comparison group (Mitchell 2006).

In addition, in data analyses from the National Education Longitudinal Study, which has monitored student achievement data and other factors for over a decade, researchers found that the risk of dropping out was four times higher when students took no CTE courses than when they completed three such courses for every four academic courses. Participation in CTE courses had an even more positive effect for the lowest achieving students (Mitchell 2006, citing Neumark 2004).

4. Higher Postsecondary Participation

Finally, postsecondary participation rates may be higher for those enrolled in multiple pathways programs. Three other studies of career academies followed students beyond high school. Two found higher rates of postsecondary participation among academy students compared with their peers, while one found no difference (Stern and Stearns 2007, p. 12). Research on school-to-work programs in the 1990s also frequently found high rates of postsecondary participation among graduates (Kazis 2005, p. 15).

Although these particular studies of career academies did control for various student background differences, their methods do not rule out the possibility that there was something about the students in the academies, rather than the programs themselves that explains these encouraging results.

Research to date suggests that the approach of integrating challenging academic and technical curricula in the context of real-world application can produce many benefits for students, especially those who traditionally have not done well in conventional high school programs. Like most research in education, the findings are not always conclusive, and the field needs additional exploration—especially more studies employing experimental design that can eliminate the potential effects of students “self-selecting” to participate in career academies and other types of multiple pathways programs.

Nevertheless, there is substantial evidence of positive outcomes for students. Perhaps just as compelling, none of the studies indicates lower performance in key areas by students in pathways compared to students in other high school programs. “Do no harm” is of paramount importance in any school improvement proposal. Pathways initiatives implemented so far respect this caution, while also producing tangible benefits for many students.




ConnectEd was founded with a grant from The James Irvine Foundation.